We continue to monitor a number of bills, but the two most important right now are HB24-1098: Cause Required for Residential Eviction and SB24-094: Safe Housing for Residential Tenants.
HB24-1098: has passed (amended) the House, and was assigned to a Senate committee. There, it was amended once again to only take effect for a tenant who has lived in a unit for 12 months or longer. This is being heard on the Senate floor, and we should know its future soon.
Important points of this bill:
Remove the traditional non-renewal option to landlords, property owners, and property managers.
Limits reasons you may evict a tenant for cause to:
- Squatters
- Nonpayment of rent
- Substantial violations
- Material violations
- Repeat violations
- No fault evictions
- For possession after a legal sale
- When the property has been sold under a judgment or decree and the party or privies to the judgment or decree refuse or neglect to surrender possession
- When an heir or devisee continues in possession in possession after the property is sold
- For a vendee that holds over after failing to comply with an agreement to purchase lands or tenements
- When a tenant has engaged in conduct that creates a nuisance or disturbance that interferes with the quiet enjoyment of the landlord or other tenants at the property, or where the tenant is negligently damaging the property
Limits reasons you may end a tenancy via the “no-fault” options to:
- Demolition or conversion of a rental premises
- Substantial repairs or renovations
- Must offer the tenant the first right to return to the property pursuant to a rental agreement of substantially the same terms, including rent in the same amount or reasonably increased amount
- Landlord or family member of the landlord assumes occupancy
- Family member limited to: spouse, domestic partner, child, stepchild, parent, grandparent, or grandchild
- Must move into the unit within 3 months after the tenant vacates
- No substantially equivalent unit is vacant and available to house the landlord or family member in the same building
- Creates a rebuttable presumption that a landlord did not act in good faith if they fail to occupy the property as a primary residence for at least 60 consecutive days after they assume occupancy of the unit
- If the landlord is on active military duty, or a spouse of an active duty service member, the notice period is reduced to 45 days
- If the landlord or family member is a person with a disability, the time to move in may be extended for a reasonable time period to allow for changes to be made to the premises to accommodate the person with the disability
- Withdrawal from the rental market for the purpose of selling the property
- Must not list the property again for a long- or short-term rental for at least 90 days after the tenant is required to vacate
- Does not apply if the landlord produces evidence that the property was listed for sale on an MLS after the tenant was required to vacate
- Tenant refuses to sign new lease with reasonable terms
- History of nonpayment of rent
- A rent payment qualifies as late if it is submitted more than 10 calendar days after the day it is due AND the landlord provides the tenant with a property service of a written notice
- DOES NOT APPLY if the rent payment is submitted within the cure period described in CRS 13-40-104 (1)(d) or 13-10-115 (4)
- All no-fault eviction notices must have a 90-day notice from the landlord
- Updates the posting requirements to: Attempted personal service once on two separate days before posting the notice in a conspicuous place
- Updates “notice to quit” to “notice to terminate tenancy”
- All demands must be written in English, Spanish, OR any other language the landlord knows, or has reason to know, is the primary language of the tenant
- No waiver of requirements by agreement
- Ask your attorney about this one, and any potential impact on mediation!
- Failure to comply with the bill can be used as an affirmative defense for the tenant
- Prohibits retaliatory rent increases
- A landlord shall not increase a tenant’s rent in a discriminatory, retaliatory, or unconscionable manner to circumvent the requirements and prohibitions set forth
SB24-094: Safe Housing for Residential Tenants – has passed the Senate, and has been introduced in the House. There is still potential for this to be amended, although since it passed in the Senate, it’s very likely that this will pass in some form or another. I’ll get a summary on this one out to everyone after it has made it through committee again.